Exit Blog

Basically, in this class, Theory of Architecture AA 532, we are given various essays on different theories every week, also we are to visit places like Kellies Castle to better understand the concepts in the essays. Our jobs every week are like journalists, writing a critique on the essay given and also the places visited. To make this class interesting upon writing these critiques, we are to create blogs and upload our critiques in this blog. In this manner, we not only learn to be more aware of architecture surrounding us, for some of us (maybe only me), we learn about blogs, and how to operate and manage blogs or something like that.

Theories had actually assists me a lot in my design class this semester. I don’t really know why the topics I find in theory are quite compatible and can be applied in design. There are altogether seven theories that we have learnt in this class namely 1) Concept of Place, 2) Heidegger’s Thinking On Architecture, 3) Remembering the Home, 4) Monument, Testimony and Memory, 5) Architecture of the Seven Senses, 6) Aesthetics, Ruins & Space, 7) Taboo and Transgression; Architecture and Desire. All these theories had open up my mind on most of the things that I had not been aware of in architecture. Theories had forced me to be poetic (learnt more poetic languages) and more mature in design. Besides, I am also more aware of architecture surrounding us (international or local architecture) and how the architects had applied the theories we learnt on these buildings. Through thorough and deep research on these topics, I learnt many philosophies and architects ideas as well as different approaches by different architects in their designs. I have also learnt how to critique even though not very well but at least had an experience and ground knowledge in critique. I realized that critique is kind of important in the field of architecture as well. In addition, sharing of ideas during discussions also allows me to understand and get other fresh new ideas from others as different people might have different opinions and thinking on certain issues.

To me, I’m the kind of person who loves travelling; going to strangers place, exploring and experiencing new stuffs gives boundless fun. But it’s a pity to us as Kellies Castle is our only field trip in semester 4. Even though half a day is sitting in the bus in the journey to the castle, still it’s nice compared to just studying boringly in class every week. It’s nice as I can get to know my friends better and at the same time experience the real piece of meaningful architecture in Malaysia. I hope that this kind of trip is organized more frequently for us so as we can be more active and have more fun-learning ways instead of in-class seminars only. =))

Actually there are no specific worst moments in studying as this is architecture in real; the path is hard and torturing. But since we are to mention it; the worst moments this semester probably I would say is the time I did the mid-term essay I guess. Research through books and internets and the problem in determining which sentence is suitable to be used had really made my head spin. @@

After going through all the theories, I personally think that I am more prone towards architecture of nature and senses. As I still believe that everything are still tied back to nature and we still need our senses to help us experience architecture. I think that architecture via senses is an interesting topic to be carried/pass on and developed. Architecture+nature+senses could be a great philosophy to work on if it can be developed well…

  • Digg
  • Del.icio.us
  • StumbleUpon
  • Reddit
  • RSS
Read Comments

Taboo and Transgression: Architecture and Desire

Apparently, everything in our lives is experienced by our body and is related to our five senses. There is no doubt that when we enter and moves through a building, we use our five senses to experience and feel the building.

Taboo a strong social prohibition (or ban) relating to any area of human activity or social custom that is sacred and forbidden based on moral judgment and sometimes even religious beliefs.( http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Taboo). While contrastingly, transgression is a violation of the law, command, or duty or to go beyond the limit of what is morally/ legally acceptable.

Based on Tschumi, architecture consists of fragments, 11 fragments which form the pleasure of architecture. In his research on architectural theories, Tschumi had borrowed ideas from other philosophers like Barthes; The Pleasure of Text. To him, the object "text" is split because of the split of the subjects "writer" and "reader". The reader becomes a virtual creator, to whom the writer offers instruments for study or a collection of references. The pleasure of the text is the moment when my body pursues its own ideas -- for my body does not have the same ideas I do. From this idea, Tschumi established a duality of space in architecture, that of conceived space and perceived space. Conceived space is concerned with the nature of space, space as a "mental thing." In order to produce, to bring something into existence, one must first has an idea how the "thing" is to be put together and what its properties are. It is this conception, a product of the mind, that is constitutive of architectural space. In fact, one's bodily senses are struck by space much more readily than one's mind is. This indicates that space is also sensory and amounts to the notion of perceived space). Architecture is made up of “fragments” and the movement of non-existence fragments are “desires”. Besides, architecture is made up of orders, it is impossible to perceive architecture without its orders. Orders are part of sensuality and are used to create desires. And transgressions are created when architecture not only satisfy the spatial expectations, but when the pleasure of space conflicts the pleasure of order, which is moving forward towards something new/modern, exceeding.

In his own version, Tschumi attempted to bridge the gap between senses (perception) and reason (conception) with what he termed the immediate experience. In this sense, therefore, architectural space is essentially incomplete, it is always either reality or concept, always missing one or the other. The paradox is that architecture is constituted by both terms, which are interdependent yet mutually exclusive. The problem lies not in the impossible of perceiving both the spatial concept and the spatial reality at the same time, but the impossibility of simultaneously conceiving and perceiving the same space:
Indeed, architecture constitutes the reality of experience while this reality gets in the way of the overall vision (concept). Architecture constitutes the abstraction of absolute truth, while this very truth gets in the way of felling. We cannot both experience and think that we experience. "The concept of dog does not bark;" the concept of space is not space.17

Eroticism, where the subjectivity of experience and the objectivity of concept become a result from the immediate experience. Immediate experience is not about perceiving spatial concept or spatial reality, its essence does not rely directly on the abstract content or the material structure of space, but rather the abrasions the experience imposes on the mental and physical confines of a particular space. It is about re-forming forms -- both conceptual ones and sensual ones. The concept or the space itself are neither erotic, but the junction between both, which is called immediate experience.

The form represents a limit and transgression penetrates to territories beyond this very limit. Furthermore, transgression does not belong in the same level as knowledge or recognition of knowledge because by acknowledging, a form is already imposed. Hence transgression has nothing to do with ideas except as where it becomes incomplete, obliterated. Transgression occupies a space where there is no theory, only practice, where writing is only one of the modes of this practice. While theory denotes the premature fixing of a form at certain point in time, practice is never conclusive, never fixed; it only ends with death of the practicing. For example from Pleasure of text, reading does not concern the translation of a work as a whole, which only uncovers the fixed meaning of a text, its end. All that can be read from a text lies in the text, but this does not necessarily mean that the magnitude of reading is limited by the coherence or the "integrity" of the text. No two readers experience a text the same way and nobody reads everything with the same state of mind. The intensity of reading changes from person to person; the pace of reading differs from reader to reader. What one encounters in reading is his own individuality, which appropriates how and what one reads. In addition, for the same person, even the experience from separate readings of the same text is different. A reader skims or skips certain passages in order to get to the more interesting parts; he turns to the back to answer whatever questions he might have in the beginning; he speeds up, slows down, stops, and again sinks back in. The beauty of all this is that from one reading/reader to the next, the rhythm of what is read and what is not is never the same. This is what creates the reader's pleasure of the text. This applies same to architecture. The way people perceive the space differs between individual, different bodies have different experiences (desires) for the same space.

As an example, the atmosphere of urban gay bathhouses in Canada reflects on how desire operates within these premises when it intersects with the bathhouse environment and health imperatives. Men's desire for other men has created a landscape of spaces (real and virtual) where sex takes place in parks, alleys, restrooms, rest stops, adult theatres, video arcades, bookstores, bars, gay bathhouses and finally, the Internet. Although the Internet is perceived as an easy way for encountering sexual partners, gay bathhouses remain the most popular and convenient way, for men having sex with men to meet for regular or casual sex. Gay bathhouses offer patrons a space within which a wide range of interactions, sensations and pleasure can be experienced. This concept had totally overcome knowledge of taboo and creates transgression. Sensuality in architecture assists humans in perceiving architecture, creating desires in different places, making transgressions overpowering taboo. Other examples of spaces which encourage desires are like shopping malls (fragments of architecture- the glass walls, the lights, the welcoming entrance) all encourages desires. It is the orders of architecture created in this space which makes it encourage desires.

Hence in conclusion, architecture is pretty much dependable on sensuality. And that sensuality makes us feel our desires highlighting transgressive architecture, leaving taboo in shadows. Fragments of architecture created spaces in which some prohibit desires while some encourages desires.



.



  • Digg
  • Del.icio.us
  • StumbleUpon
  • Reddit
  • RSS
Read Comments

Asthetics, Ruins, and Space


William Kellie Smith, the man whom built Kellie’s Castle originated from a village in Scotland named Kellas. In 1890, Smith arrived at Malaya( now Malaysia) and fortunately he met Alma Baker, an estate owner in Malaysia whom had won concessions from the state government to clear 360 hectares of forests in Perak. Smith then works and earns his fortune from Alma Baker. With the much fortune, he then venture into the rubber and tin mining industry, the two most famous industries in Malaysia at that time. He then owns Kinta Kellas Estate and Kinta Kellas Tin Dredging Estate.
Blessed with all the fortune he earned in Malaysia, Smith went back to his hometown, Kellas and married his wife, Agnes. Not long after that, he was blessed with a baby girl, Helen. However Smith was still not satisfied as he had always wanted a son to inherit all his property in Malaysia. After many years, Agnes gave birth to a son named Anthony. Being the happiest man in the world, Smith decided to build a castle/mansion to celebrate the birth of his son and also as a present/gift to his wife for giving birth to Anthony.

How the idea / concept for this castle pops out?? Actually, it is just a simple story behind the design of this castle. As the castle is built for his son, Anthony, of course the design/ the story of the design process is somehow related to him. Generally, as we know that Smith wanted a son so badly, with no doubt, we can know that he would do anything suggested by the villagers just to get Agnes pregnant. Then , one of the Madras laborers tell him to pray to Amman, a Hindu Goddess, in the belief that his wish is granted. He did everything, he prayed and finally he was blessed with his son, Anthony. To show his gratitude and appreciation to the Hindu Goddess, he then decided to build a Hindu temple for the Goddess. Due to his fascination and admiration of Hinduism religion and also Indian culture, he plans to build his castle with influence of architecture similar to that in Madras, with the construction materials imported genuinely from India. Even the construction workers/ laborers hired to build his mansion were all Indians. He wanted a total Indian style in the building. This building was then designed in Greco-Roman style with Moorish arches and walls.

Architecture of the building,
Kellies Castle is connected to the main road by bridge running across the stream. Besides, it believed that there are two tunnels buried under the river that exist in this building. One specially built by Kellie to enable his family to connect to the Hindu temple he built nearby. It is said that this castle contains an elevator that connects to the top floor and the first that existed in Malaysia. This castle is a two storey building with a functional roof top for parties or some other occasions and also a six storey tower, an underground wine cellar also a few secret chambers. While On the second floor William actually planned to build an indoor tennis court. IN addition, Kellies castle not only serves William’s family member only. It also functions like a hotel providing shelter/ place to stay for William business partners or something – a hub for entertaining wealthy colonial partners settled in Malaya.

There are several reasons behind the restoration of Kellies Castle. In my opinion, the castle-a piece of meaningful architecture built at that era with mostly imported materials from other country should be restored to let us know the story/ history which had happened in that area at that time. Without this piece of old history, people wont be able to know / come to know who is William, what had happen to him and why he wanted to build this castle for. His main purpose of building this castle and also the temple nearby this main structure will be a doubt to all of us. Kellies Castle act as a piece of timeless architecture which records all the history happening at that time, bringing us back to that era, not to repeat history but to address/ express history to the new generation.

Besides, Kellies Castle is also restored due to its unique design which was even published in London Financier Newspaper on 15 September 1911. It is impossible to find or produced another exactly the same piece of this architecture again. This is as most of the construction materials are imported from India. Besides, it is impossible to have exactly the same workmanship as the Indian labourers William hired to work for him at that time. Also it is believed that this building is the first in Malaya to contain elevator which runs up the top floor. This kind of memory and meaningful history which had been created in this castle cannot be recreated again in a similar manner…Hence, it is important and wise to have it preserved carefully.

I think that this 6 storey tower made of brickwork is quite interesting and beautiful as nowadays, you can hardly find brickwork building. Nowadays, building are all steel, glass and reinforce concrete. Brick structure with all the unique arches as openings and doors well address the material originality and the age of the building.

All these details taken from Kellies Castle and it is all something very unique and historical. All these wooden structures are something you can’t find in any new/ modern building.

Beauty of the material – originality of the material is showed. No plaster/ finishes. Photo 1 and 2 is actually the floor inside the castle.

The ugly part that I found in this building is the part where the brickwork had collapse and some is not uniform/ not stacked straightly. Possibly, it is the rain that damages this beautiful ancient piece of history. I find this ugly as I thought that if this building is preserved well, these damages would not occur.



Personally, when I walked into the castle from the entrance, it gives me an old and full with history feeling. An ancient piece, strong and massive but the spaces in it are empty and abandoned. Inside the castle, it gives a haunted and creepy feel as the structure is quite high with repetitive high arches added with incomplete spaces without handrails and narrow walkways. Also some of the spaces are labeled with scary names as well.

  • Digg
  • Del.icio.us
  • StumbleUpon
  • Reddit
  • RSS
Read Comments

An Architecture of the Seven Senses

Architecture can be defined as the art and study of designing buildings. And what make up senses?? Our senses, are created by our five organs, our eyes, nose, hands, ears, and tongue. Naturally awarded by God to us, our five basic organs enable us to hear, see, smell, touch and feel. Without this, we won’t be able to see our favourite show everyday, hear our favourite song, and smell our mum’s nice home-cooked meal, touch and feel. In the same manner, we won’t be able to experience architecture without having our senses.

From the article given, I totally agree with the standpoint that architecture is experienced by humans through senses. The author below writes about the relation between human senses and with the architecture surrounding them.

“Jewish Bodies, Christian Senses, Urban Spaces”Laura Hollengreen, Georgia Insitute of Technology
Apart from manifestations of sanctity, experience of sexuality, and conduct of war, nothing stimulated the sensory imagination of medieval Christians as much as the Jew. Building on work I’ve presented elsewhere on the spatial and, in particular, the urban aspects of medieval Christian-Jewish interaction—in examples from eleventh-century Mainz, twelfth-century Rouen and Oxford, and thirteenth-century Chartres—I propose in this paper to extend my study by incorporating detailed information about the Jewish quarters of other medieval cities (probably Paris, Norwich, York, and one German city).
The medieval Christian sensorium was often depicted as assaulted by Jews—Christian hearing was outraged by Hebrew chant, sight confused by unmarked Jews, smell offended by noxious odors, taste deceived by wet nurses’ milk, and touch sullied by Jewish hands working for profit or other evil. At the same time, the “spectral Jew,” as defined by historians like Stephen Kruger, was produced precisely by the effacement of real Jews. Focusing on a small set of urban case studies, I seek to locate and to measure the conjunction of historical (including archaeological) evidence of Jewish-Christian contact on the one hand and literary/artistic testimony on the other. Preliminary conclusions are that although the homes of Jews were regarded as particularly dangerous, that is where most small loans by Jewish moneylenders were contracted; that the protection of person and commerce afforded Jews by lords’ castles was subject in unpredictable ways to the political relations between Christian elites; that synagogues and other Jewish ritual structures were typically modest in scale and sometimes all but invisible to Christian eyes; and, perhaps most tellingly, that Jewish offense to the Christian sensorium emanated so forcefully from a fundamentally corporeal conception of Jews that it lingers as much in records of public streets and squares as it does in evidence about specific buildings. Not surprisingly, medieval Jews frequently evinced what I have termed an “agora-aversion”.

Sounds play an important in architecture. This is because without sound, the building will be dull, boring and empty. Sound is important for us to fully experience the building. Sounds are one of the easiest things to be remembered in our minds. When sound is generated, we capture the sound and recognized the sound and keep it in memory. When the sound is played again, immediately we can be able to recall the sound as heard before. Besides, there are many different types of sounds. Loud sounds, soft sounds, high pitched sound, low pitched sounds, creepy sounds, and many more….And different sound gives different impressions and feelings to different people. In architecture we are able to use sounds to feel/ describe spaces. There are of course different sounds for different built environment. Different sounds to communicate with the inhabitants in it. Sight makes us communicate through our eyes, but a vision without sound effect is dull, plain and solitary. Sound enhances our view on something. Sound also makes us connect with the architecture surrounding us when it is reflected through these structures. In addition, Echoes are produced only when there is an enclosed space. If there is no surface where sounds can be reflected, it will disappears by its own and echo will not be produced. As an additional example, an architecture which works with sound-the Roman Colosseum. The radial and round shape of the Colosseum amphitheatres amplifies sound in certain manner. Sounds path are calculated and analysed properly to enable it to work with the structure, thus amplifying it.


Architecture presents the drama of construction silenced into matter and space; Architecture is the art of petrified silence. This means that architecture, a non-living/ lifeless object, unable to speak is able to communicate to humans. Of course, it is not a ‘talking building’ but it communicates via the construction elements and also designs orders. Different from dramas and stories, dialogues and words, make us understand the storyline. Buildings and cities are instruments and museums of time. Through buildings, we are able to find story, history of that place; this is as there are different styles of buildings in different era. Architecture, like the recorder of time/history, slows down time, with all the historical elements in it, allows us to understand our passed history.



"the timeless task of architecture is to create embodied existential metaphors that concretize and structure man's being in the world. images of architecture reflect and externalize ideas and images of 1ife; architecture materializes our images of ideal life. buildings and towns enable us to structure, understand, and remember the shapeless flow of reality and, ultimately, to recognize and remember who we are. architecture enables us to place ourselves in the continuum of culture".
Juhani Pallasmaa: "Architecture of the Seven Senses." A+U, July 1994

Architecture paused time and brings us all back to ancient era. Solitude, understood as the state of being alone. In architecture, I think that it means only individual, the viewer speaks individually with the building. Architecture should be able to convey its message to each individual. So if the architect designs the building well or with thoughtful consideration, the building itself will present a clear message to everyone. If not, architecture is almost a failure. For example, the building itself should be able to lead the people to the right place. Designs which speaks, works as signage itself.

“Smelly” is what we remembered most of a garbage dump area. “Smell” is the most easily remembered thing of a space. A certain smell would make us recall different areas. But when smell is gone, it takes a lot of memory and imagination to recall it back. And of course different smell makes us recall different memories. Memories are then enhanced with great power of imagination. Memories aren’t wonderful if you are unable to imagine it. Same goes to architecture, power of imagination is very important. Provided with the images of architecture, the building and spaces will not be interesting if one does not put his/her imagination in. If you are able to imagine the architecture images, it would be more interesting.


“Already during the Prophet Muhammad’s lifetime in the seventh century, a pleasant smell became an important aspect of communal worship in the mosque, as mentioned in his collected sayings and deeds (hadith). For instance, once during congregational prayer Muhammad noticed the body odor of a group of believers who worked in menial jobs and traditionally wore heavy woolen garments; he told them to wash and perfume themselves before prayer, so as not to disturb fellow worshippers. As the Ottomans were upholders of Sunni Islam, they emphasized the continuation of such practices.
The smellscape of sixteenth-century Ottoman mosques can be partially reconstructed based on documents preserved in different archives in Turkey, in the form of the charters specifying the conditions of the endowments responsible for the administration and upkeep of the mosque complexes. These charters routinely mention the employment of a buhurcu or buhuri, a person who perfumed the mosque on Fridays and other holy days. Using the case of the buhurcu as a springboard, I will discuss the types of smells and perfumes that worshippers could sense inside the mosques—such as the prayer rugs’ wool, the wooden Qur’an stands and chests, the mosque lamps fueled by olive oil, the plants in the garden surrounding the mosque, the water in the mosque courtyard, and the aroma of the food served in the soup kitchens often attached to larger mosque complexes.”
“Olfactory Aspects of Ottoman Mosque Architecture” by Nina Ergin, Koc University


The author states that the smell in the Ottomans mosque reminds people most of this unique piece of architecture.


By sense of touch, we can sense our surrounding. Actually our minds are capable of reflecting back what we’ve sense before. Like for example, maybe our hands and eyes had already recognized the texture and feel of a pencil. Then when we close our eyes and are given back the same thing, we can recall back the shape and texture and automatically we know that it is a pencil.


For ancient times without the advancement of technology yet, man normally uses their body for scale. Proportions- anthropometry. Older times, buildings are shaped according to human own bodies. But now technology seems to take over all manual work and enables many impossible buildings to be built. More creative and innovative designs are created. It is also said that architecture is not experience by viewing only. The whole human body should be involve in the experience. For example, when you walk up the stairs, your legs touches the ground and hands touches the handrail, it makes you connect with the spaces surrounding. Hence, architecture should be experienced not only by our views, we must also feel the space with our body.


This is like the use of body to think or something. Then the person then identifies himself with its center of gravity, its mass, its weight, he realizes its volume, and the space that the shape takes over in the air. The encounter of any work of art implies a bodily interaction. The work of art functions as a person, with whom we converse. An architect also internalizes a building in his body. He should be able to feel his building, the mass, the scale and so on correctly. This is so as the inhabitants understand the building structure. If the architects themselves can’t communicate with his design, then it is impossible that others understand it. Architecture strengthens verticality, meaning that you can be able to see that architecture has built up from the ground(Earth) and enable us to get higher from ground. Without buildings, we are constantly on the ground. Even now, architecture enable us to touch the sky with skyscrapers.


Besides vision, smell, sound, and touch, taste is also an important sense in architecture. Different architects have different taste in their designs of buildings. This is merely called their architectural identity. For example, Frank Gehry taste or style, once you look at the building, automatically you can know that it is Frank Gehry’s building without any indicators.

Architecture structures man’s being in the world. Architecture materializes life, concretize time and creates continuous culture for us. As for me, I believed that I experienced the space through senses, maybe not all senses used. I hear, I see, I smell, I touch and I feel architecture. The building I am about to describe is KLPAC, Kuala Lumpur Performing Arts Centre located in Sentul West Park designed by landcape architect Ng Sek San. This adaptive reuse building really touched my heart when I see it. An amazing piece of architecture by Ng Sek San, this piece of art is able to communicate to people with its design. In KLPAC, sounds of people practicing dramas feels the space, participants shouting, yelling and many more makes us remember the sounds which fills up this building. If weren’t for this sounds, this building wouldn’t have been KLPAC. I see KLPAC and it gives me the sense of vision, the image it produces tells me history of the building. Image reflected to my eyes tells me that this building are an old building built during British Colonial Era with the materials and architectural styles. The arches, brickwork and classical columns represent themselves well. A slight touch on the old brickwork reminds me of Neoclassicism….In addition, when I enter KLPAC building from the entrance, the brutalism of the natural unfinished concrete work gives me the feel, the injection of a new life into an old building. Without any understanding on this building, merely by experience, I feel that the massiveness and rigid form of the building functions to carry the “art centre” identity. The message KLPAC gave me when I was communicating with it, spending time in it is that “We as future generations should preserve old architecture, instead of demolishing a still-strong standing structure, and creating greater carbonprints on our Mother Earth, why not we make use of the already built structure to create new spaces” The beauty of old architecture should be appreciated. In my opinion, the architect managed to convey the message of “Preservation and Conserve Old building” to us. Hence, KLPAC represents itself well merely with its design and construction



  • Digg
  • Del.icio.us
  • StumbleUpon
  • Reddit
  • RSS
Read Comments

Monuments, Testimony, and Memory

Jews in Germany really had a rough time being accused by Hitler for wanting to take over/ruled Germany. In the ‘filthy Jew’ book, Hitler wrote about how the Jews planned to "contaminate" the blood of pure Germans:
"The Jewish youth lies in wait for hours on end.......spying on the unsuspicious German girl he plans to seduce..........He wants to contaminate her blood and remove her from the bosom of her own people. The Jew hates the white race and wants to lower its cultural level so that the Jews might dominate." "Was there any form of filth or crime...without at least one Jew involved in it. If you cut even cautiously into such a sore, you find like a maggot in a rotting body, often dazzled by the sudden light - a Jew."
Hitler, a very cruel and ‘totalitarian’ person was too sensitive over this issue and was too afraid that the Jews would take over his empire in Germany. For this, he treated Jews in Germany badly and we did not know the truth behind the German citizens’ boycott of Jews. Is it because of the pressure by Hitler or otherwise??..

In 2001, Jewish museum designed by world renowned architect, Daniel Libeskind to tell Non-Jewish the story and sufferings of Jews in Germany. It is also used to commemorate the Jews who died in the torturing. This Jewish Museum is opened with grand celebrations by the Germans which shows how welcoming/ positive they are in recognising this museum in Germany. They thought that the opening of this museum would mean the end of Nazi.
As one German put it; “the Germans are absolutely crazy about this museum.” When asked why, this scholar (an expert on anti-Semitism} responded that because of the enormous effort and capital expended, the Germans feel that this signals the end of the Nazi past, finally putting the Germans on the “right” side after fully learning the necessary lessons from the past. He maintained that the museum symbolizes the total acceptance of Jews in Germany and a final act of absolution for the Germans. Richard McBee September 16, 2001 Published in The Jewish Press

Jewish Museum consisted of two parts. The old part, Kollegienhaus, a former courthouse and also the new part, a zig-zag structure designed by Daniel Libeskind. The entrance to this new dramatic structure by Daniel Libeskind is actually attached to the old building. There is no proper entrance to this museum. Visitors will enter the stately cream colored Baroque palace of the former Berlin Municipal Museum. Then, visitors will follow an underground passageway, a steep ramp to Libeskind building. These underground tunnels are divided into three paths showing different pathways taken by the Jews. The long and steep road leads to the ‘Axis of Continuity’ which leads to the exhibition space as well. The second pathway leads to the ‘Axis Exile and Emmigration’ leads to daylight as well as a garden. The whole garden plank is set on a surface that is slanted in two directions simultaneously, giving sense of imbalance as one tries to orientate between the sky, the trees and sliced views of the surrounding architecture.
This best symbolises the instability and chaos undergone even by those whom managed to get out of German. The plants growing above the pillars symbolises hope for those whom escaped. The third pathway would be the ‘Axis of Holocaust’. This is a dead end. Series of dark windows line the corridor. There are also displays of personal items of those who did not survive in the Holocaust. You can imagine the high steep tunnel getting narrower and darker approaching towards the end. Silence makes the space creepier.
This shows the end of Jewish life in Germany.

Besides, another important element would be the ‘Void’, a 20m tall empty space which slices across the whole building in a straight line showing the absence of Jewish citizens to the Germans. They give visual expression to the loss of Jewish life in Germany. German citizens are prohibited from entering the Jewish shops with “Star of David” logo stick outside the shop. This is Hitler’s way of slowly spoiling and bringing down Jewish economy in German. Jewish in Germany are never respected and are tortured badly by Nazi. The floor of the Void is fully covered with thousand of round metal discs with open mouth faces named ‘Shaleket’ designed by Menashe Kadishman.

As for the exterior look of the building, Libeskind design it in such a way that it shows some kind of massiveness and toughness, high and huge tall walls of zinc. The material is chosen based on old Berlin tradition. The amazing thing is the untreated alloy of titanium and zinc will oxidise and change color when exposed to sunlight and weather. The openings across the building is also carefully designed by Libeskind to give the structure aesthetic value as well as creating the Jewish ‘feeling’ interiorly. Besides, Libeskind makes use of natural light to light up and also decorate the spaces making the space interesting to visitors. Several lines which intersects with each other following certain matrix formed the openings of the Jewish museum, making the plain and dull facade attractive.

Basically, Libeskind was inspired by three aspects when he was designing the Jewish Museum. Libeskind got his idea from the “Star of David” used at that time by Nazi to discriminate the Jewish shops and German shops and that shops with this logo means that it is a “Jewish shop” and German locals are not allowed to buy from them. This is one of the way Hitler used to force Jews to death. By spoiling Jews economy and forcing them out of the country.. The shape of Jewish Museum by Libeskind is a reminiscent of “Star of David”.

On the other hand, being a musician himself, Libeskind was pretty much inspired by the three-act opera by Arnold Schoenberg named Moses and Aron, eventhough the third act was unfinished. It is a response in drama form to the anti-Jew movements in the German and also a drama to express himself as a Jew being forced to leave. As the opera was unfinished, Libeskind aimed at completing it in the design of Jewish Museum.
Thirdly, Libeskind read the book ‘Gedenkbuch’ which contains all the names of those Jews deported and died in Holocaust. In addition, Libeskind also based his design on Walter Benjamin’s One Way Street comprising 60 sections which determines the number of section in the museum’s zig-zag section.

Based on my understanding on the design of this museum, I think David Libeskind managed to potray the story of Jews in German to the public with this amazing piece of architecture. The whole piece of architecture seems to bring us back to the Nazi era and tell us the story of how Jews are treated by the anti-Semitic team during Nazi era. All parts of the Jewish Museum reminds us of the Jews, either they survived(being deported) or being pressurized to death by Nazis. It is amazing that every part of the structure, out from the form until details of the openings are all related to the sad history of Jews in German. For example, in the Axis of Holocaust, personal items of those died are exhibited giving us a clear image of how badly are Jews being treated by Germans at that time.


As for Malaysia, our history icon would be our National Museum located at Jalan Damansara, Kuala Lumpur. Our National Museum is a building which houses and cares for a collection of artifacts and other objects of scientific, artistic or of historical importance and these things is made available for public viewing. Our National Museum was built after independence in 1959 and was officiated by our Third Yang di-Pertuan Agong Tuanku Syed Putra Al-Haj Ibni Almarhum Syed Hassan Jamalullail on 31st August 1963.


To symbolise our nation’s culture, the architect, decided to build our National museum in a traditional Malay style( Rumah Gadang-Minagkabau architecture), blending in a little modern style. This makes it up to date with modern architecture as well as carrying our national identity in the architecture. The two large murals of Italian glass mosaic placed at the front facade of the structure depict the development of Malaysia over the years. Our National Museum is a typical three storied structure of neo-traditional Malay house which houses four exhibition galleries exhibiting Malaysia’s history and vast cultural diversity. The four art galleries comprises of the Prehistory Gallery, The Early Malay Kingdom Gallery, Colonial Era Gallery and the Malaysia Today Gallery.


The Prehistory Gallery shows visitors from the formation of Malay Archipelago and also all the historical sites in Malaysia. For example, exhibited is the Perak Man dated 10,000-11,000 years. Also showcases history of Malaysia from the ‘Paleolitic Era’, ‘Neolitic era’ and so on. Early Malay Kingdom shows visitors history of Malaccan Empire, trading, as well as Islam religion. Colonial era gallery shows history of Malaysia more towards independence, formation of our Nation. Malaysia Today Gallery shows more of nationalistic movements towards independence, development of Malaysia until today.


Among things exhibited other than historical texts are weapons, ceramics, shipwreck porcelains, coins, medals and so on. There is also a central hall in which the highlighted architecture is the finishes for the floor which are blue geometric-design mosaic tiles from Pakistan together with the intricate carved panels on the ceiling. The central Hall of this museum is meant for temporary exhibitions/ foreign exhibitions.


I found out that although our National Museum’s architecture managed to portray traditional Malay culture with the use of traditional Malay houses architecture; it does not show diversity of cultures in Malaysia well with the architecture. The architecture of the Museum doesn’t give non-Malaysians the image of cultural diversities in Malaysia. For example, if we are to compare the Jewish Museum in Berlin as to Malaysia’s National Museum, we can see how the architect design in such a way that the architecture presents itself well to the visitors, while in Malaysia, architecture is still not very dramatic as compared to Jewish Museum. Our Museum tells us story merely through its collections of artifacts, exhibitions, research, publications, educational and public programs rather the architecture itself doesn’t speak.


In my opinion, Malaysian heroes, our heroes can be best commemorated with architecture and as well as the historical items left behind by our heroes. As Libeskind has said, “It is the responsibility of architecture and culture to address events and history” It is best to commemorate with architecture as “A building and a city are always present across time and across history. The act of building transforms the culture of a city.”


As a conclusion, culture and history of a Nation are strongly related to architecture. It is important for us, as Architects to preserve our Nation’s history with architecture. We could keep a Nation’s history and show other people our unique culture by expressing it through Architecture. In simple words, Architecture, eventhough it can’t speak like us, but it can present itself well through different kind of expressions(designs) like the way Jewish Museum presents the story of Jews to public.

~Malaysia Tanah Tumpahnya Darahku~

=)=)=)

  • Digg
  • Del.icio.us
  • StumbleUpon
  • Reddit
  • RSS
Read Comments

Remembering the Home

Home is a place of residence for human, shelter from rain and hot sun and also from protect own selves from enemies. It is a place in which an individual or a family can rest, escape from their busy life outside and be able to store their personal property. My home in which I grew up in is in my hometown, Muar Johor. Certainly I miss my home so much as it is the place where I grew up in, filled with sweet memories throughout my childhood life. Without doubt, everyone have their own home and for me, and a home is the origin place where people would return to after being out. This is because our home is the place in which all our history is kept. To describe this in a simpler manner, we can say that once history is created in a place, a space is created, and this space then becomes our home where we constantly relied upon or return to this particular space for shelter.

Similarly, our Mother Earth can also be described as our home seeing this from a wider frame. For example, a person being away from his own country for a long time will eventually still return back to his country for some reasons. This ‘phenomena’ occurs naturally.
To understand the concept of Home even further, we should first understand ‘space’ first. Space is actually the three dimensional extent in which objects are placed in and in which events occur in relation with time. It is because of the existence of the object in the space and also certain specific events which had occurred in that area which made it a space. Natural philosophers, Gottfried Leibniz, thought instead that space was a collection of relations between objects, given by their distance and direction from one another. Leibniz’s statement supports me in my opinion of space is made up of relation of objects in relation with time. Besides, space is also made up of history of human activities which occur as time goes…Time creates history. And the context in which history is created forms place which becomes space recognised/ known by humans. German philosopher, Immanuel Kant described space and time as elements of a systematic framework that humans use to structure their experience. And for the perception of space; that is, spatial representation of the environment includes an innate component that predates any actual perception of the environment itself. As time pass, history is created in context of the space, the object or human are in. Space and time can also be calculated mathematically according to various mathematician philosophers. Space creates place for human to stay then, our Home is created… Home sweet home~


My home is just a typical house made up of concrete blocks and glasses installed in the pierced concrete block to form openings.. Although it is just another normal house to anyone, it appears special to me as every bits and parts of this house is designed by my parents carefully as it is my parents’ dream house. And of course my home influenced me a lot in various parts of my life.;the way I live, my habits, my perception of a perfect home and many more.. Most importantly my home does also affect me in my understanding of place and architecture.


First and foremost, I would like to start off with the person I admired the most in the world, my mum, being the maintenance person of the house; and with her own creativity, she created many decorations in our house which I loved a lot. She uses many recycled materials as well in creating decorations. It is actually not recycled, she reused most of the old/ abandoned things to decorate our house and I love her ideas very much.. I am going to show a few reused things she used that impressed me. For example, there is this ‘tikar’ which my brother used for his camp and are thrown aside after the camp ended. My mum used it as a blinds/ decoration over the window in our kitchen. It is indeed very Nice..This influenced me to reuse and recycle materials in design.. Always reuse materials and not to waste. For example, in my design, I used broken pieces of colourful glasses stick together to form a nice complete piece of glass which can be used as decorative art piece hung on the wall/ can also be used for openings. Photo below shows the bedframe being used to create a small frame for the white stones..and also the pot use to burn charcoal or something being used to plant flowers...


Besides, mum loves to decorate our house with real plants planted in vases. It creates somekind of ‘bringing nature into house’ feeling. This also influenced me to incorporate nature in my design so as to make the building/ house look more lively. Open interior spaces of my house also allow cross ventilation and make my home always cool and windy. This feature is very useful in my design as it provides thermal comfort to occupants and make sure that they are comfortable. This ensures that the building has a longer lifespan as the occupants are well suited with the environment in the building.


And ‘what is so special about marble tiles and parquet floor’?? I just realized that my previous old house and current new house used mostly marble tiles and parquet for floor finishes. This rectangular shaped marble tiles aren’t even cheap. Initially I thought my mum like these materials so much but now only I understand that marbles helps to cool down our house naturally and the original whiteness of this material create sense of ‘clean and tidy’ in our house. Being suited and familiar with these materials since small, I thought that it is beneficial and naturally nice to use these materials in my design. Maybe it suits my eyes more or maybe is the benefits of the materials itself.. I don’t know.


To end this, again I would like to emphasize that a home means a lot to everyone. Home is the place for shelter, place to rest, place to protect ourselves from enemies and of course place that we go back to everyday after school/ work. Our home, the place all of us grew up in contains all our sweet memories should be preserved carefully so that all history are remembered. Today, I realized that my “home” had more or less influenced me in my design approach in many terms..

~~Seindah rumahku~~

  • Digg
  • Del.icio.us
  • StumbleUpon
  • Reddit
  • RSS
Read Comments

Critique on the Essay Heidegger's thinking on Architecture




Everyone has different thinking or their own opinions on architecture. This goes the same as Heidegger, he had a unique/ special thinking on architecture, pretty much different from us.
Heidegger has his own concept of how he defines the world which we often thought of as more abstract and cannot be defined in words. Heidegger defines world as concrete totality as in he believes that when there is the existence of thing/ an object, there exist world, and that the world is the place where human being live and world gives things it look. Heidegger then says that the world is a fourfold of earth, sky, mortals and divinities. Means that he always interpret things in terms of object (concrete) rather than abstraction. Heidegger uses the temple as his example to explain the world existence.

Man and God are related in the context of dwelling as described by Heidegger in the example he used, the temple. The temple, the architecture of the temple made man feel like as if we are with God. Architecture, the temple connects the Earth and the sky which made the world exist and man are able to feel the presence of God through the thing (temple) build on Earth. Temple are built/designed with their own identity so as to depicts the presence of God. Temples from different places has different characteristics and are carefully designed as they are dwellings to God and should represent God well. This sacred place is formed to let man feel the presence of God. A simple example; normally some people would feel God existence and pray only when they perform their prayers at these sacred places like temples, church, mosque and so on. In the Tabernacle, we find God dwelling among His chosen people. "Let them construct a sanctuary for Me, that I may dwell among them. According to all that I am going to show you, as the pattern of the tabernacle and the pattern of all its furniture, just so you shall construct it" (Exodus 25:8-9). The Tabernacle symbolized the dwelling place of God in the midst of His people. "There I will meet with you; and from above the mercy seat, from between the two cherubim which are upon the ark of the testimony, I will speak to you about all that I will give you in commandment for the sons of Israel" (v. 25). Saphir says, "The Tabernacle was a symbol of God's dwelling. There is a Sanctuary, wherein is the especial residence and manifestation of the glorious presence of God. . . Almost all expressions which are employed in describing the significance of the Tabernacle are also used in reference to Heaven." Title: Exodus 25-40 God Dwelling with Man Series: Christ in the Old Testament. I agree with Heidegger’s points saying that architecture (temples, church, mosques, Sikh temples and many more) are able to relate man to God as the place is used for dwelling for the God. So when you enter the temple, you are able to feel God…

The sketch is actually St. Andrews Presbyterian Church in Kuala Lumpur which is the international church of Kuala Lumpur. St. Andrews church is built by the Scottish in the early years for expatriate to pray on Sundays/any other day. This church is chosen by me as I personally think that the design of this church following the layout of a typical catholic church really lets its visitors feel the presence of God inside. The ambient and quiet mood created in the space ( sacred hall) really makes me feel that God is always with us and are listening to every word I am thinking and saying. The majestic look also gives me a feeling that we need to respect the Almighty God..How they made us feel that God is with us in the hall???.. As in my opinion, lightings are the biggest factor/ elements used to create this kind of feeling. The creative and nice play of natural and artificial lights created a sense of God to us in the space. The two stained glass creates colourful lights and also lightens the image of God on the glass bringing up the feeling again. When natural light strikes, it creates colourful lights which lighten the dull mood of the space. It made us believe that this is the dwelling of God….

Heidegger again and again emphasize on the point that world is formed by placing or having things on earth and that the thing connects the earth and sky forming a World. And human is the origin of the world as humans explores and sees the thing placed on earth. The World is the place where we humans live/ dwell. The World we always say and imagine is made up of fourfold of earth, sky, mortals and divinities. Besides, things visit mortal in the world. Things gather fourfold together in their own way. For example, a bridge (thing) connects the places and make the places exist for man to explore. Human life takes place on Earth and architecture(things) between earth and sky forms dwelling for human and a World is then formed. Man and nature is related in such a way that man is in between the earth and sky. Man dwells in nature and speaks to nature via words~language. Where everything in nature is already named and hence man recognize things via images and names that they had already have.

A world gives things their look. Which means that the world is seen as a whole embodiment of the earth, sky, things, man, language and so all this gathers and gives us a look of what a world really looks like. A simple example; this means that what kind of image will we reflect on when people say about a World. In simple words, our home, the place we dwell is a place in nature, is built naturally in this world, between earth and the sky. I agreed with Heidegger points that a place exist when there is a thing placed between the earth and the sky and that the place is made visible to humans.

Heideggar describes place in such a way that the place will come to presence when there is a bridge(thing) which joins the human to the place. A place on Earth will only be present if there is a thing which connects the place to us/ when a thing is placed on Earth. Heideggar also states that “what is within the world is also within space.” “Spatiality” is a property of being in the world. A place comes into existence when humans give meaning to a part of the larger, undifferentiated space. Any time a location is identified or given a name, it is separated from the undefined space that surrounds it. Some places, however, have been given stronger meanings, names or definitions by society than others. Tuan, Yi-Fu (1980). This statement by Tuan, Yi Fu strengthen my point on the presence of place. Yi Fu mentions that a place comes into existence only when human give meaning to the place, creates history at that particular place. Building are locations and that the locations admits the fourfold and installs the fourfold.



When all the things between the earth and sky connects and form a World and with human life taking place on earth, a connection can be seen forming a cycle. And hence the thingness of the things in which the world they gather. Then phenomena is used to described this cycle. Dwelling is a place which human being lives. Dwell simply means to lie somewhere and dwelling refers to a house, apartment and where a person lives. Language as a source of communication so that we can recognize the things surrounding us. When the object is given a name / recognized for what it is, it will always be recognized as it is.




As a summary, Heidegger thought that a World is formed by having things between the Earth and Sky and that man connects to these things via language. Language makes man understand the things surrounding us by giving names to the things and let us recognize them as what they are named. Then all the things with the fourfold forming a world are then connected and formed a phenomena which introduces time and shows how things happen in nature. This describes more of the sequence of the happenings in the World..Heidegger merely thinks that art is not used to represent something but it presents itself to the public and that languange is not use to communicate but rather it speaks for itself...His thinking is different from what we always think of architecture and the World.

  • Digg
  • Del.icio.us
  • StumbleUpon
  • Reddit
  • RSS
Read Comments

Critique on the essay "The Concept of Place"

In our era of modernism, advancement in technology, sciences has created almost unlimited boundaries to Architecture and built environment. This then make architects more and more creative in their designs satisfying human needs and demands. Remember that we had always said that we wanted life without boundaries, ‘Free life’, like a bird, fly anywhere they like, of course this question came through architects and urban designers’ minds when they are designing. Many creative and innovative designers had come out with ideas of mobile designs, so as we are free from the monotonous( dull) environment. Unfortunately, these projects are still strongly attached to the fundamentals of concept of place.

For example, the author uses example of such projects by Dutch utopian Constant Nieuwenhuis named New Babylon. And Constant then says ‘In New Babylon everybody will always be travelling and will never feel the need to return to the place of origin, because it will anyhow have undergone a transformation. As a consequence New Babylon does not possess a determined plan. Every element is on the contrary left in a state of indetermination, mobility and flexibility.’ Constant wants to create a mobile environment as mobile life seems more interesting. Mobile life could be interesting however mobility could spoil the interaction between human and decreases social activities. But aren’t utopian idea is all about ideal community and society?? However, this concept turns out to be negative. The author supported his points by quoting words from American urbanist Milton Webber; ‘The essence of the city is not place but interaction’. It is true of what the author tries to convey as when the place is mobile, interaction is impossible and the place turns out dull without a community, it loses its importance and enthusiasm. The author supports his point with evidence from architectural theorist Christopher Alexander saying that ‘..the social pathologies which are characteristic of urban life, delinquency and mental disorder, depend inevitably on the lack of direct contact.’ From here, we know that the author tries to stand on his point on the concept of place in which mobile environment creates changing images and decreases interaction which is the ‘soul’ of a place.
Existential space is then used to describe the concept of place even deeper. The concept of space is then explained based on natural psychology. The author referred to Swiss psychologist Jean Piaget to explain the concept of space based on natural psychology. I agree with Piaget point that it is impossible to arrive at any cognition without having an emotional relationship to the object, and without understanding it in a spatial and temporal context. Architecturally, it is impossible to recognize/ understand the space without its context or environment. Piaget states that “An object is a system of perceptual images endowed with a constant spatial form throughout its sequential displacement and constituting an item which can be isolated in the causal series unfolding in time.” We would always generate images of the context/ environment of the space before we understand and gain knowledge of the place. The space/place is defined by its surrounding environment independent of the space which changes with time. The space itself should adapt to its surrounding environment.
The author then states that the world of child is evidently “egocentric”, meaning that everything is centralized or will return to the central point once it started. Everything has its central point or starting points and will always reflect back on its starting point or origin once it has started. The author then supports his points with a simple theory of his child’s thought of the environment. It is true that the when we say existential space is “egocentric”, we recognize that it varies from individual to individual. This is as everybody’s perception of central points might be different. One might think that this is the central but others might have a different opinion. The author uses Gestalt psychology to prove his points, “Man orders his environment spontaneously according to certain “perceptual laws,…”

Next, concept of space is said to be connected to human actions by a German philosopher Otto Friedrich Bollnow which means that a space is recognize by human settlement on it. Once human step foot on the place and expands the place, the place slowly gains its name/popularity. Bollnow writes, “Space is conquered through man’s actions”. Concept of place is then explained by means of place of action and point of departure. When there is a reference point, there is a pathway/ guide to start or move. For example, this can be described architecturally also, there is always a starting point as in where a human start moving, and this creates a central point. When human moves, it creates lines and directional words such as behind, on top and below can be used to define human movements. Then from lines (human pathway) adjoining the point of arrival and point of departure, a plane is then created. “Existential space,” exists independently of the immediate situation, possessing its own order and stability compared to immediate space. Immediate space can be spaces human go temporily away from home while existential space can be defined as ‘home’. I agree with the author with his point; when the centre of the immediate space coincides with the centre of existential space, we feel like as if we are home. The author is supported by Bollnow saying : “The double movement of departure and return reflects a differentiation of space in two zones, a smaller internal one and a surrounding external one. The first is the intimate world of the house and home, the second the outside world into which man departs and from which he returns. The distinction of these zones is of fundamental importance for the structure of lived space.” The closer the range between these zones, the more familiar the space is to the person.

Human environment as described by the author is not two dimensional. The third dimension is the vertical axis expressed by terms “up” and “down”. Personally, I thought that there is no difference between the vertical and horizontal axis. The author’s evidence on this point is not very convincing as he explains that the “vertical axis is traditionally considered sacred dimension of space. It indicates a “way” which leads to a reality “higher” or “lower” than our everyday world.” Another evidence from Erich Kastner saying that “the idea of salvation is generally associated with the mountain…” shows us more of the sacredness of the vertical axis. The existential space may also be described in terms of life pattern. I agree with the author’s saying that life follows a rhythmic pattern as what we do everyday/ our daily life follows a sequence of patterns repetitively and that what gives us our own personal style and lifestyle. The author used Piaget’s quote saying; “Life itself is a creator of patterns” to defend his thoughts. Besides, our life has relations also to the space. Moreover, one can identify the space based on the activities which had occurred at that particular space as well. I am convinced by what the author say; “when an action takes place, the place where the action occurs becomes meaningful, in the sense of expressing the possibility of the very occurrence.” So, the space is defined by the activities people carry out in it.
Existential space is the term used by the author to denote concept or image of the environment. When the environment does not allow the development of the existential space, the space needs to be modified accordingly in order to allow it to adapt well with the environment. For example, the author gives simple example like switch on the light telling us that we can alter/install new elements into the space in order for the space to adapt to the environment (changes in time-night and day).

The author then explains how natural elements are used and how they are developed. In my opinion, natural spaces are built depending on what the site offers, for example, if the trees in the jungle have the potential to be somekind of ready-made columns (part of design), it is considered as making use of the natural elements as well. The author then uses Rudolf Schwarz’s quote saying; “We talk about landscape spaces and think of the landscape as a house: the mountain are the walls, the bottom of the valley is the floor, the rivers the ways, the coasts the thresholds, and where the mountain becomes low is the gate.” The author also says that the built form is also determined by the character of the landscape. I agree with this also as for example, lightweight timber structure (timber stilts) is used for structure on mangrove swamps as the soil condition is not that strong to support heavy structure. (Marang Safari Resort Terengganu)

Besides that, it is also important to distinguish between the interior and exterior space. This is important since the author says that man cannot feel “at home” in a space without limits. The author gives examples such as Venturi house, how Robert Venturi creates spatial differential by using curves. In my opinion, spaces can be determined in many ways. For example, designers might want that particular space to stand out, he will use a different shape like circles (squares as basic) to make the space look more interesting and differentiate the space automatically.
As a conclusion, “The Concept of Place” generally explains to us why a place or space should not be mobile as space is greatly influenced/determined by its context/environment. And that Utopian projects focuses on interaction between communities, hence mobility is a no-no to a fixed project like this. The author explains the concept of place from many different angles and explains existential space to make us understand the concept of place. I think that the author is quite convincing and he support his points by backing up most of his statements with quotes from the experts and lastly, he too conveys his message well to the readers.

  • Digg
  • Del.icio.us
  • StumbleUpon
  • Reddit
  • RSS
Read Comments

Critique on the film 'Minority Report' starring Tom Cruise

‘Minority Report’ is a film starring Tom Cruise and directed by Steven Spielberg. This movie is about an imaginary police department called Precrime, in Washington DC in the year 2054, main lead by John Anderton, a Chief Inspector in Precrime. Precrime is the name given as crimes are predicted first by three psychics which they referred to as Precogs and they prevent crime from happening. The author, Philip K.Dick is very imaginative and tries to show us how the future would look like. For example, cars driven vertivally on the walls, scanned eyeballs instead of having IDs, people flying individually like Superman instead of sitting in helicopters.

Initially, this movie starts off with an introduction on how Precrime polices prevent murder from happening. Predictions from the Precogs are used to rewind time and catch the criminals before they committed the crime. Then there comes Danny Witwer, representative of the Department of Justice, in which he came with an aim to understand more about Precrime program. Then here comes the climax when Precogs predicts that John Anderton will kill a totally unknown man to him named Leo Crow. Shocked by the predictions himself, he ran away from Precrime. The author has then gave us an impression that Witwer could have set him up. Anderton suspected Witwer most for setting him up. Curiosity grows in viewers mind on whom has done it.

Anderton then looks for Dr Iris Hineman, the lead researcher for Precrime. Precogs predict the future but sometimes they have different thoughts on it and she reveals that Agatha, one of the Precogs often had different vision, the Minority Report. To avoid getting caught by Precrime, Anderton then undergoes surgery to replace his eyes and uses his old eyes to gain access to Precrime office. Agatha is stolen from Precrime as Anderton was keen to find out the true story of his life, why he wanted to kill the man he don’t even know. Reading images from Agatha’s mind, Anderton sees the same images as what he had seen in Precrime. After that, Agatha then shows images of this woman Ann Lively, who died drowning. Agatha asked Anderton ‘Can you see?’ which creates more curiosity among viewers.

Being chased by Precrime, Agatha and Anderton then ends up in Crow’s house where Anderton is going to kill Crow as in prediction. Curiosity builds up again when the author & director make us ask, Why Anderton wants to kill this man whom he don’t even know?? Answers are then revealed when he saw photos of his son on Crow’s bed. He is then determined to kill Crow. Agatha which has a different thought kept on repeating the line ‘You can choose, you can choose’ to prove that Precrime protocol is not always correct. Murderers can still choose their own destiny until the very last minute. Witwer then finds out something weird about Ann Lively’s death and met Burgess to discuss about it. Having thought that Witwer would discover the truth behind Ann Lively’s death, Burgess killed Witwer.

Anderton then had no choice but to bring Agatha to his ex-wife’s house. Here, Anderton comes to know that Ann Lively is actually Agatha’s mum and that is why she kepts on showing Anderton the same image of Ann Lively to let him know the secret behind her mum’s death. Precrime polices have tracked him down just because he knows this little secret. Then during Burgess’s celebration dinner, Lara helped Anderton and Burgess bad acts are shown to everyone. Burgess then killed himself….


There are a few things that I find quite impressive in this movie. One of it is the curiosity the author and director had created in this movie. The curiosity when John Anderson’s name, the chief inspector of Precrime appears on the red ball and images of him killing a man named Leo Crow. Curiosity when the director made it as if Witwer is the one who set Anderson up knowing his illegal drug problems. Curiosity to know who has been behind all this bad acts hiding himself up. Curiosity of whether Anderson would pull the trigger or not when he pointed the gun on Crow. In this scene, author tries to tell us that our future is still in our hands until you put your words to action. We still can change our decision until the real action has been carried out. For example, this is when Agatha says ‘you can choose’ and repeated it a few times. Curious also to know who killed Ann Lively just to prove that Precrime is correct. Another thing I find impressive in this movie is the author & director’s natural instint and impression of Future. He predicts the look of the Future and expresses to us via the movie with use of high-tech equipments as well as a play of natural sciences.

Well, the context of this movie is pretty much imaginary and futuristic with the use of high technologies and a little play of sciences, like cars driven vertically, eyeballs are scanned instead of using ids, 3D images appears from a small and simple drive and many more. And the story of this movie about predictions of the Future by these mutated humans called Precogs and from the predictions, Precrime crew would prevent crime from happening by catching the person before they commit the crime. I think this prediction story with mutated humans as predictors fits well with the context, a highly technology design environment.

I think the author of this movie tries to tell us that our future is determined by ourselves. Our future is not set and we should not let fate determine our future. For example in the movie, Precrime works to catch those people whom Precogs predicts as criminals. These criminals are not given a chance to change their minds. Predictions of future can’t always be correct. Maybe these murderers change their minds last minute and decided not to kill instead. However, they are not given the chance to do so, they will be caught innocent and jailed forever. I think that the author conveys his message well.

Personally, I think movies inspire design thinking sometimes. And of course movies like this have an impact on design thinking. Author or director often expresses their feelings through symbolic and figurative words, dialogues, and also the backgrounds/context of their works, similar to architects and designers in which they express their feelings in their designs. From this movie, we can see how the author expresses his impression of how the Future looks like and he creates nice context or environment by combining technology and sciences to give us a futuristic feeling. And of course the context fits well with his story…=)

Thanks for reading ya =)
References
http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Minority_Report_(film)
http://www.ehow.com/how_5084277_write-critique-essay.html



  • Digg
  • Del.icio.us
  • StumbleUpon
  • Reddit
  • RSS
Read Comments

My Architecture Life

My childhood moments that lead to architecture
Um, actually there isn't any particular childhood moments that leads me to architecture , And to be frank, I hadn't even thought of my ambition seriously until time forces me to do so..=.= and this is after completing my pre-u, Ausmat in Sunway-U, only the ambition question pops out.. Till then only i surfed the net, visit various different universities for their information on rankings, best courses that suits me and of course, their shocking fees!! Cracking my minds for the final decision, UCSI is then chosen out of so many other tempting and beautiful universities in Malaysia...woohOO!!

Why did I choose Architecture?
.. hmM....Archi-tecture??..why??.. haha..last time, i'd actually searched through the Jobstreet.com for interesting jobs in Malaysia, it sounds a bit silly but that's what i did..However at that time, I've already had a few fields that I would like to venture in which are chemical engineering as a Chemist as I love Chemistry very very much, and maybe phsycology as well. I was very much into Science at that time and it bores me in my pre-u, hence, I thought that a little combination of art and science would be fun, Architecture cames to mind then...

Best experiences studying Architecture
Okay, the best experience in Architecture is of course getting to know many many crazy friend, crazy in a positive way =)..Friendly and helpful friends over here in Architecture school compare to others. hmM,..I loved it when we have field trips or any site visits to wherever interesting places. The togetherness and teamwork during last minutes in all group projects was unforgettable. Staying up overnights together even though without sleeps was fun! Studying architecture changes the way I look at different things too...

Worst experiences studying Architecture
Worst experiences in studying architecture are of course when too much work piles up at the same time and there is only limited amount of time left. Whoo, that smells like no sleeps, no rest, no perfect meals, and caffeine all day!! hmM, its Architecture that we are saying right noW, so....i guess we all know whats worst...

Best habits throughout my studies
I don’t have any specific best habits actually..sounds like so ‘rendah diri’, haha, maybe i didn’t realise the good habits myself. Or can Workaholic be my best habits?? since i was given a workaholic tag by all my friends..

Worst habits throughout my studies
Plenty! Playing facebook, sleeping so damn late everyday, drink few cups of coffee in a day, and many more. And the worst habit is changing the Whole design Concept last minute or after finished all drawings...Then at the end of the day ends up Crying as there is no more time left to finish up the whole project..Seriously, this is the WORST!!

What keeps you going? Anything specific?
I’m going to build my own Home, my dream house!! Browsing through magazines, seeing famous architects creating and designing something special and brand new to everyone, gaining Fame and be admired for a unique design is nice. I want the photo of everything I design in every magazine you can find about Architecture. So thats what keeps me going..

  • Digg
  • Del.icio.us
  • StumbleUpon
  • Reddit
  • RSS
Read Comments